AI 判断
模型共识与 Glicko-2 评分都倾向于 Brady, Patrick。完整分析见下方。
开赛前锁定推荐 赛后核验结果 公开命中记录 →
| Deckers, Alec | Brady, Patrick | |
|---|---|---|
| 胜率 | 62.5% | 52.4% |
| 硬地胜率 | 65.4% | 52.4% |
| 红土胜率 | 60.3% | 66.7% |
| 草地胜率 | 0% | 45.5% |
| 决胜盘胜率 | 56.7% | 44.2% |
| 抢七局 % | 56.5% | 54.3% |
| 冠军(总数) | 4 | 0 |
| 近10场 | WWLWWLWLWW | WWLWWLWWWL |
来源: scorego-app.com
| Deckers, Alec | Brady, Patrick | |
|---|---|---|
| 场均ACE | 12.50 | 2.64 |
| 场均双误 | 2.75 | 1.5 |
| 场均破发 | 2.29 | 3.14 |
来源:tennisstats.com (per-比赛 averages)
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026自然年胜率 | 55.9% 19 / 34 比赛 | 64.7% 11 / 17 比赛 |
| 近12个月胜率 | 61.8% 34 / 55 比赛 | 62.5% 15 / 24 比赛 |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026自然年胜率 | 50.0% 2 / 4 比赛 | — 0 / 0 比赛 |
| 近12个月胜率 | 55.6% 5 / 9 比赛 | — 0 / 0 比赛 |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026自然年胜率 | 0.0% 0 / 1 比赛 | 42.9% 3 / 7 比赛 |
| 近12个月胜率 | 0.0% 0 / 1 比赛 | 42.9% 3 / 7 比赛 |
来源:tennisstats.com
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| 交锋胜场 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 盘 | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) |
| 年内胜场 | 53.7% 22 / 41 比赛 | 58.3% 14 / 24 比赛 |
| 近12个月胜场 | 58.8% 40 / 68 比赛 | 58.1% 18 / 31 比赛 |
| 当前排名 | 585 | 812 |
来源: tennisstats.com
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| 奖金(生涯) | $37,131 USD | $21,453 USD |
| 评分 | 585 | 812 |
| 年龄 | 26 | 21 |
| 身高 | 1.93m | 1.88m |
| Weight | 83kg | 76kg |
| Playing hand | Right-handed | Right-handed |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| 比赛胜场 | 54 % | 58 % |
| 三盘胜场 | 54 % | 58 % |
| 直落盘数取胜 | 32 % | 46 % |
| 落后逆转取胜 | 21 % | 9 % |
| 至少赢下一盘 | 71 % | 75 % |
| 第一盘获胜 | 49 % | 63 % |
| 第二盘获胜 | 54 % | 58 % |
| 第三盘获胜 | 56 % | 43 % |
来源:tennisstats.com
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| 1st serve percentage | 0% | 100% |
| 1st serve 分 won | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 2nd serve 分 won | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Break 积分 Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 1st return 分 won | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd return 分 won | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Break 积分 Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Service 积分 Won | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return 积分 Won | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 总分 积分 Won | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 近10场 balls | 0 | 0 |
| 比赛 分 saved | 0 | 0 |
| Service games won | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return games won | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 总局数 won | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
来源:tennisstats.com
| 日期 | 赛事 | 结果 |
|---|---|---|
| May 2 2023 | M25 Nottingham 3 ITF 男子 (硬地) | Alec Deckers 0 – 2 Patrick Brady |
来源:tennisstats.com
总分与专项玩法的结果百分比:每位球员的数值及一列比赛总计。
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均每盘局数 | 10.39 | 10 | 10.2 |
| 大 6.5 | 92 % | 100 % | 96 % |
| 大 7.5 | 87 % | 75 % | 81 % |
| 大 8.5 | 79 % | 63 % | 71 % |
| 大 9.5 | 64 % | 50 % | 57 % |
| 大 10.5 | 41 % | 42 % | 42 % |
| 大 11.5 | 41 % | 42 % | 42 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均ACE | 12.50 | 2.64 | 15.14 |
| 单场最多ACE | 92 % | 14 % | — |
| 1+ | 100 % | 79 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 100 % | 71 % | 100 % |
| 3+ | 100 % | 43 % | 100 % |
| 4+ | 100 % | 29 % | 97 % |
| 5+ | 100 % | 7 % | 97 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均破发 | 2.29 | 3.14 | 5.43 |
| 大 0.5 | 92 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| 大 1.5 | 33 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| 大 2.5 | 33 % | 100 % | 96 % |
| 大 3.5 | 0 % | 100 % | 67 % |
| 大 4.5 | 0 % | 43 % | 67 % |
| 大 5.5 | 0 % | 43 % | 34 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均抢七 | 0.64 | 0.42 | 0.53 |
| 大 0.5 | 54 % | 38 % | 46 % |
| 大 1.5 | 10 % | 4 % | 7 % |
| 小 0.5 | 46 % | 63 % | 46 % |
| 小 1.5 | 90 % | 96 % | 7 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均双误 | 2.75 | 1.5 | 4.25 |
| 大 0.5 (1+) | 100 % | 86 % | 97 % |
| 大 1.5 (2+) | 58 % | 57 % | 93 % |
| 大 2.5 (3+) | 33 % | 7 % | 77 % |
| 大 3.5 (4+) | 25 % | 0 % | 66 % |
| 大 4.5 (5+) | 25 % | 0 % | 44 % |
| 大 5.5 (6+) | 17 % | 0 % | 36 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net 积分 Won Per 比赛 | 5.9 | 18 | 23.9 |
| 大 4.5 (5+) | 40 % | 100 % | 70 % |
| 大 5.5 (6+) | 40 % | 100 % | 70 % |
| 大 6.5 (7+) | 40 % | 100 % | 70 % |
| 大 7.5 (8+) | 40 % | 60 % | 50 % |
| 大 8.5 (9+) | 40 % | 60 % | 50 % |
| 大 9.5 (10+) | 40 % | 60 % | 50 % |
来源:tennisstats.com
Deckers, Alec对阵Brady, Patrick・2026年8月18日 — Roehampton, Great Britain.
PropickAI的Glicko-2模型给出主队41%的胜率。 完整分析——状态、交锋、赔率以及PropickAI的AI预测——在本页继续呈现。
我们的模型预测(Glicko-2)
PropickAI模型 · 与市场盘口对比(无抽水)
2 Brady, Patrick — 59%
模型估算: 胜 Deckers, Alec 41.4%, 胜 Brady, Patrick 58.6%. 模型热门 — Brady, Patrick.
信息性估算,非投注建议。
数学模型预测
Based on the collected pre比赛数据, the 热门 looks like Brady, Patrick.
仅供参考
赔率来源: 共识 5 博彩公司 (Baltbet, Betcity, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). 这是从赔率中剔除博彩公司抽水后的公平概率——参考信息,非预测或投注建议。
模型共识
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
市场共识
剔除博彩公司抽水后的共识概率;右侧数字为当前最优赔率。仅供参考,非投注建议。
AI 概览
AI 分析:1/7 就绪 · 仍在准备:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Claude, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
Patrick Brady is favored to win this hardcourt match at the Roehampton Challenger. The pre-match analysis points to a clear structural advantage for the British player on his home soil.
Outcome Probabilities and Market Context
The analytical model suggests a 42% probability for an Alec Deckers victory (P1) and a 58% probability for a Patrick Brady win (P2). This baseline lines up perfectly with historical data and court adjustments. Patrick Brady has already proven his technical advantage over Deckers in direct matchups, and playing in London provides him with additional physical and environmental comfort.
Current Form and Qualification Trajectory
Both competitors entered the main draw through the qualification stages, holding an identical WLWWL metric over their last 5 appearances. However, their physical exertion in yesterday's final qualifying round differed significantly:
Alec Deckers had a grueling, three-set battle against Ali Habib (3-6, 6-3, 6-2). He blasted 11 aces but also leaked 5 break point opportunities.
Patrick Brady pulled off a highly efficient, straight-sets upset (6-1, 6-4) over the qualification's top seed, Olukayode Alafia Damina Ayeni. Brady stayed composed, dropping his serve just once while breaking his opponent four times.
Head-to-Head (H2H) History
The head-to-head record stands at 1-0 in favor of Patrick Brady. They faced each other on a similar fast, indoor hardcourt back in 2023. Brady won that encounter in straight sets (7-5, 6-3), successfully nullifying Deckers' huge serve by winning 72% of his own first-serve points and converting critical break opportunities.
Injuries, Lines, and Extra Markets
There are no reported injuries or suspensions for either athlete; both are fully fit and highly motivated for this Challenger 50 event. Given the fast nature of the Roehampton outdoor hardcourts, breaks of serve will be at a premium.
Total Games Line: Over 22.5 Games. Deckers' reliance on his big serve suggests at least one long or tiebreak-threatened set, pushing the game count higher.
Exact Score Forecast: 0:2 in favor of Brady. Brady's cleaner returning style and superior court coverage should allow him to resolve the match in two tightly contested sets.
Main Bet Conclusion
The primary recommendation is to back Patrick Brady to win (P2). His straight-set performance yesterday against a higher-seeded opponent, combined with his existing 1-0 H2H edge over Deckers, confirms that his tactical toolkit matches up perfectly against the Dutchman's style.
| AI | 1 | 2 | 比分 | 总局数 | Bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI | 42% | 58% | 0:2 | 大 22.5 | P2 |
通过 完全访问 获取7个AI的共识、数学模型概率、价值投注和每场比赛的完整报告。
免费畅玩:起始拥有 $10,000 虚拟资金。用我们的赔率投注本场比赛,追踪盈利并登上全球排行榜。无需真钱,无需注册。
数据库已收录双方参赛者的近期比赛。
We mark in green only strong signals where the 模型 passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
网球数学模型. 网球没有平局:基础信号来自球员评级、场地、状态、发球/接发及赛事疲劳。在滚球逻辑中,盘状态和谁在发球比总分更重要。
Glicko-2是一项球队实力评级:它综合权衡盘口、历史与稳定性,但并非保证。
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration 进行中). Glicko41.4% · +Elo prior (weight0.40).
网球没有平局:基础信号来自球员评级、场地、状态、发球/接发及赛事疲劳。在滚球逻辑中,盘状态和谁在发球比总分更重要。
投注提示基于盘口、市场及我们的数学模型生成:仅在模型与市场一致时才采纳信号。
| 结果 | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | 1.98 50.5% | |
| 1.86 53.8% | 1.83 54.6% | 1.83 54.6% | |
| 1.97 50.8% | 1.93 51.8% | — | |
| — | — | 1.77 56.5% | |
| 1.86 53.8% | 1.87 53.5% | 1.91 52.4% | |
| 1.76 56.8% | 1.77 56.5% | — |
| 结果 | Baltbet | Betcity | Kambi BetMGM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 大 2.5 | — | — | 2.23 44.8% |
| 大 8.5 | — | — | 1.22 82.0% |
| 大 9.5 | — | — | 1.75 57.1% |
| 大 10.5 | — | — | 3.10 32.3% |
| 大 21.5 | 1.88 53.2% | 1.85 54.1% | 1.60 62.5% |
| 大 22.5 | 1.86 53.8% | 1.88 53.2% | 1.82 55.0% |
| 大 23.5 | — | — | 2.04 49.0% |
| 小 2.5 | — | — | 1.62 61.7% |
| 小 10.5 | — | — | 1.34 74.6% |
| 小 21.5 | 1.84 54.4% | 1.85 54.1% | 2.20 45.5% |
| 小 22.5 | 1.86 53.8% | 1.82 55.0% | — |
| 结果 | Baltbet | Betcity | Kambi BetMGM | Kambi Unibet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.30 43.5% | 2.30 43.5% | 2.38 42.0% | 2.38 42.0% | 2.25 44.4% | |
| 1.56 64.1% | 1.54 64.9% | 1.55 64.5% | 1.55 64.5% | 1.57 63.7% |
Deckers, Alec
Gannon C. 🇮🇪
Yilmaz K. 🇹🇷
Brady, Patrick
Hudd E. 🇬🇧
Martin T. 🇬🇧
The Deckers, Alec - Brady, Patrick 解析——结果、概率、风险与历史——在免费登录后即可查看。
根据 PropickAI 模型,Brady, Patrick 更被看好,胜率约 59%。
7 个 AI 模型的共识和 Glicko-2 评分倾向于 Brady, Patrick。完整概率和博彩赔率见本页。
2026年8月18日。