AI 判断
模型共识与 Glicko-2 评分都倾向于 Broom C。完整分析见下方。
开赛前锁定推荐 赛后核验结果 公开命中记录 →
| Rybakov A | Broom C | |
|---|---|---|
| 胜率 | 54.9% | 59.6% |
| 硬地胜率 | 54.8% | 62.5% |
| 红土胜率 | 54.9% | 33.3% |
| 草地胜率 | 50% | 50% |
| 决胜盘胜率 | 44.9% | 52% |
| 抢七局 % | 41.7% | 50% |
| 冠军(总数) | 0 | 8 |
| 近10场 | WLWWLLWLLL | WWWWWWLLWW |
来源: scorego-app.com
| Rybakov A | Broom C | |
|---|---|---|
| 场均ACE | 4.72 | 6.12 |
| 场均双误 | 2.94 | 2.06 |
| 场均破发 | 1.53 | 2.83 |
来源:tennisstats.com (per-比赛 averages)
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026自然年胜率 | 31.3% 5 / 16 比赛 | 72.3% 34 / 47 比赛 |
| 近12个月胜率 | 37.9% 11 / 29 比赛 | 72.0% 54 / 75 比赛 |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026自然年胜率 | 54.6% 6 / 11 比赛 | 0.0% 0 / 2 比赛 |
| 近12个月胜率 | 54.6% 6 / 11 比赛 | 0.0% 0 / 2 比赛 |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026自然年胜率 | 50.0% 1 / 2 比赛 | 55.6% 5 / 9 比赛 |
| 近12个月胜率 | 50.0% 1 / 2 比赛 | 55.6% 5 / 9 比赛 |
来源:tennisstats.com
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| 交锋胜场 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| 盘 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| 年内胜场 | 41.4% 12 / 29 比赛 | 67.2% 39 / 58 比赛 |
| 近12个月胜场 | 42.9% 18 / 42 比赛 | 68.6% 59 / 86 比赛 |
| 当前排名 | 507 | 289 |
来源: tennisstats.com
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| 奖金(生涯) | $176,503 USD | $286,390 USD |
| 评分 | 507 | 289 |
| 年龄 | 29 | 28 |
| 身高 | 1.85m | 1.78m |
| Weight | 77kg | 82kg |
| Playing hand | Left-handed | Right-handed |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| 比赛胜场 | 41 % | 67 % |
| 三盘胜场 | 41 % | 67 % |
| 直落盘数取胜 | 28 % | 50 % |
| 落后逆转取胜 | 19 % | 21 % |
| 至少赢下一盘 | 72 % | 81 % |
| 第一盘获胜 | 45 % | 67 % |
| 第二盘获胜 | 55 % | 64 % |
| 第三盘获胜 | 31 % | 56 % |
来源:tennisstats.com
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 0 |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 |
| 1st serve percentage | 84% | 63% |
| 1st serve 分 won | 68% (40/59) | 70% (37/53) |
| 2nd serve 分 won | 36% (4/11) | 58% (18/31) |
| Break 积分 Saved | 3/5 | 10/10 |
| 1st return 分 won | 30% (16/53) | 36% (21/59) |
| 2nd return 分 won | 42% (13/31) | 64% (7/11) |
| Break 积分 Converted | 0/10 | 2/5 |
| Service 积分 Won | 63% (44/70) | 65% (52/80) |
| Return 积分 Won | 35% (28/80) | 37% (26/70) |
| 总分 积分 Won | 48% (72/150) | 52% (78/150) |
| 近10场 balls | 4 | 6 |
| 比赛 分 saved | 0 | 0 |
| Service games won | 80% (8/10) | 100% (10/10) |
| Return games won | 0% (0/10) | 20% (2/10) |
| 总局数 won | 40% (8/20) | 60% (12/20) |
来源:tennisstats.com
总分与专项玩法的结果百分比:每位球员的数值及一列比赛总计。
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均每盘局数 | 9.76 | 9.34 | 9.55 |
| 大 6.5 | 97 % | 97 % | 97 % |
| 大 7.5 | 90 % | 88 % | 89 % |
| 大 8.5 | 69 % | 66 % | 68 % |
| 大 9.5 | 48 % | 36 % | 42 % |
| 大 10.5 | 28 % | 19 % | 24 % |
| 大 11.5 | 28 % | 19 % | 24 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均ACE | 4.72 | 6.12 | 10.84 |
| 单场最多ACE | 50 % | 48 % | — |
| 1+ | 94 % | 88 % | 97 % |
| 2+ | 67 % | 82 % | 93 % |
| 3+ | 56 % | 67 % | 92 % |
| 4+ | 56 % | 64 % | 86 % |
| 5+ | 50 % | 55 % | 77 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均破发 | 1.53 | 2.83 | 4.36 |
| 大 0.5 | 44 % | 94 % | 100 % |
| 大 1.5 | 39 % | 91 % | 97 % |
| 大 2.5 | 39 % | 24 % | 96 % |
| 大 3.5 | 0 % | 6 % | 47 % |
| 大 4.5 | 0 % | 3 % | 35 % |
| 大 5.5 | 0 % | 3 % | 35 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均抢七 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
| 大 0.5 | 31 % | 29 % | 30 % |
| 大 1.5 | 0 % | 5 % | 3 % |
| 小 0.5 | 69 % | 71 % | 30 % |
| 小 1.5 | 100 % | 95 % | 3 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 场均双误 | 2.94 | 2.06 | 5 |
| 大 0.5 (1+) | 83 % | 76 % | 96 % |
| 大 1.5 (2+) | 61 % | 55 % | 92 % |
| 大 2.5 (3+) | 56 % | 33 % | 79 % |
| 大 3.5 (4+) | 44 % | 24 % | 67 % |
| 大 4.5 (5+) | 33 % | 9 % | 54 % |
| 大 5.5 (6+) | 11 % | 6 % | 49 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | 比赛总分 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net 积分 Won Per 比赛 | 10.5 | 8.07 | 18.57 |
| 大 4.5 (5+) | 100 % | 73 % | 87 % |
| 大 5.5 (6+) | 93 % | 67 % | 80 % |
| 大 6.5 (7+) | 86 % | 33 % | 60 % |
| 大 7.5 (8+) | 79 % | 27 % | 53 % |
| 大 8.5 (9+) | 79 % | 20 % | 50 % |
| 大 9.5 (10+) | 79 % | 20 % | 50 % |
来源:tennisstats.com
Rybakov A对阵Broom C・2026年8月19日 — Roehampton, Great Britain.
近期战绩(胜平负):Rybakov A 2-0-3,Broom C 3-0-2。 PropickAI的Glicko-2模型给出主队27%的胜率。 继续阅读以查看详细数据、往绩交锋、博彩公司盘口,以及PropickAI神经网络的判断。
我们的模型预测(Glicko-2)
PropickAI模型 · 与市场盘口对比(无抽水)
2 Broom C — 73%
模型估算: 胜 Rybakov A 26.9%, 胜 Broom C 73.1%. 模型热门 — Broom C.
信息性估算,非投注建议。
数学模型预测
Based on the collected pre比赛数据, the 热门 looks like Broom C.
仅供参考
赔率来源: 共识 4 博彩公司 (Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). 这是从赔率中剔除博彩公司抽水后的公平概率——参考信息,非预测或投注建议。
仅供参考
↓ 赔率下降(资金流入该赛果),↑ 赔率上升(赔率走弱)。仅供参考,非投注建议。
模型共识
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
市场共识
剔除博彩公司抽水后的共识概率;右侧数字为当前最优赔率。仅供参考,非投注建议。
AI 概览
AI 分析:1/7 就绪 · 仍在准备:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Claude, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
Pre-Match Analysis: Alex Rybakov vs. Charles Broom
The upcoming Round of 16 clash at the Roehampton Challenger I features American left-hander Alex Rybakov against the 6th-seeded local favorite Charles Broom on outdoor hardcourts. The bookmaker line indicates a substantial shift favoring Broom, with his odds dropping from 1.30 to 1.22, while Rybakov's odds drifted from 3.20 to 3.80. This movement mirrors our underlying analytical model, which identifies Broom as a heavy tactical favorite.
Player Form & Head-to-Head (H2H)
Alex Rybakov (USA): Rybakov entered this match with a recent 3-1 run (WLWW). In the previous round on August 18, he recorded a solid 2:0 victory over Faris Zakaryia (6-1, 7-6). He displayed an exceptionally strong first-serve efficiency, winning 92% of his first-serve points.
Charles Broom (GBR): Broom is on a blistering 5-match winning streak (WWWWW). He cruised through his opening round on August 18 by completely overwhelming Filip Pelivo with a 2:0 scoreline (6-1, 6-1), dropping zero double faults and winning 79% of his first-serve points.
Head-to-Head: There are no prior recorded official head-to-head encounters between these two players on the professional tour, making this their inaugural match.
Key Tactical Factors & Divergence
Our analytical model places the win probability at 27% for Rybakov and 73% for Broom. There is no fundamental reason to diverge from these numbers.
Broom has massive advantages: playing on home soil at the National Tennis Centre, a surface he knows perfectly, and carrying immense competitive rhythm from his flawless win streak. While Rybakov put up excellent serve numbers in his opener, Broom's exceptional returning form—breaking Pelivo 5 times in the previous round—will consistently pressure the American's service games.
Final Match Predictions
Match Winner (P1/P2): P1 (Rybakov) 27% / P2 (Broom) 73%
Exact Score By Sets: 0:2 in favor of Charles Broom.
Total Games: Under 21.5 games. Broom’s current defensive and breaking efficiency points toward a swift, single-sided affair.
Conclusion
The primary recommendation is to back Charles Broom to win 2:0 in sets. His spectacular current momentum, combined with home-court motivation and excellent hardcourt coverage, makes a straight-sets victory the most mathematically and tactically justified option.
| AI | 1 | 2 | 比分 | 总局数 | Bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI | 27% | 73% | 0:2 | 小 21.5 | Charles Broom to 胜 2:0 by 盘 |
通过 完全访问 获取7个AI的共识、数学模型概率、价值投注和每场比赛的完整报告。
免费畅玩:起始拥有 $10,000 虚拟资金。用我们的赔率投注本场比赛,追踪盈利并登上全球排行榜。无需真钱,无需注册。
数据库已收录双方参赛者的近期比赛。
We mark in green only strong signals where the 模型 passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
网球数学模型. 网球没有平局:基础信号来自球员评级、场地、状态、发球/接发及赛事疲劳。在滚球逻辑中,盘状态和谁在发球比总分更重要。
Glicko-2是一项球队实力评级:它综合权衡盘口、历史与稳定性,但并非保证。
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration 进行中). Glicko26.9% · +Elo prior (weight0.37).
网球没有平局:基础信号来自球员评级、场地、状态、发球/接发及赛事疲劳。在滚球逻辑中,盘状态和谁在发球比总分更重要。
投注提示基于盘口、市场及我们的数学模型生成:仅在模型与市场一致时才采纳信号。
| 结果 | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| 2.30 43.5% | — | |
| 3.15 31.8% | — | |
| 11.00 9.1% | — | |
| 9.50 10.5% | — | |
| 1.50 66.7% | 1.75 57.1% | |
| 1.18 84.8% | — | |
| 1.10 90.9% | — | |
| 1.55 64.5% | — | |
| 1.30 76.9% | — | |
| 1.01 99.0% | — | |
| 1.02 98.0% | — | |
| 2.40 41.7% | — | |
| 4.10 24.4% | — | |
| 5.30 18.9% | — | |
| — | 2.01 49.8% |
| 结果 | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 10.00 10.0% | |
| 6.50 15.4% | |
| 1.07 93.5% | |
| 1.02 98.0% |
| 结果 | Fonbet | Kambi BetMGM |
|---|---|---|
| 大 2.5 | — | 2.70 37.0% |
| 大 8.5 | — | 1.32 75.8% |
| 大 10.5 | — | 3.45 29.0% |
| 大 19.5 | — | 1.48 67.6% |
| 大 20.5 | 1.17 85.5% | 1.73 57.8% |
| 大 21.5 | 1.50 66.7% | 1.89 52.9% |
| 大 22.5 | 7.30 13.7% | — |
| 大 23.5 | 1.80 55.6% | — |
| 大 24.5 | 8.50 11.8% | — |
| 大 25.5 | 2.95 33.9% | — |
| 小 20.5 | 4.20 23.8% | — |
| 小 21.5 | 2.40 41.7% | — |
| 小 22.5 | 1.05 95.2% | — |
| 小 23.5 | 1.90 52.6% | — |
| 小 24.5 | 1.03 97.1% | — |
| 小 25.5 | 1.35 74.1% | — |
| 结果 | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 大 2.5 | 10.00 10.0% |
| 小 2.5 | 1.02 98.0% |
Rybakov A
Broom C
The Rybakov A - Broom C 解析——结果、概率、风险与历史——在免费登录后即可查看。
Sportradar · Winline StatsHub
根据 PropickAI 模型,Broom C 更被看好,胜率约 73%。
7 个 AI 模型的共识和 Glicko-2 评分倾向于 Broom C。完整概率和博彩赔率见本页。
2026年8月19日。